Beyond Secondary Cities: A Deep Dive into Emerging Market Strategies for Data Center Investors (Part 2)
While established markets grapple with power constraints and increasing competitive dynamics, a significant portion of future data center value creation may emerge from markets that many institutional investors have yet to fully evaluate.
The global digital infrastructure landscape is evolving in complex and uneven ways, potentially creating diverse opportunities for strategic investors who understand regional nuances.
In our previous analysis "From Regional Players to Global Leaders: How Data Center Investors Are Reshaping Digital Infrastructure (Part 1)", we explored how the challenges in primary markets might be driving diversification into secondary cities, alternative developed regions, and previously overlooked opportunities within established economies.
We examined how forward-thinking investors can sometimes find compelling opportunities by looking beyond traditional hubs to markets with adequate infrastructure foundations and growing regional demand.
This second installment extends the global perspective by exploring the specific investment strategies that might help navigate truly emerging data center markets.
While our previous discussion highlighted opportunities in established regions, this analysis focuses on both the unique challenges and potential opportunities in developing economies where thoughtful early-stage positioning could, under the right conditions, contribute to long-term portfolio advantages.
While conventional wisdom often suggests emerging markets primarily represent higher risk for potentially higher returns, the reality may be more nuanced.
Many successful data center investors in these regions aren't simply accepting greater risk—they're implementing sophisticated strategies that might actually help manage risk exposure while pursuing growth opportunities that can be increasingly difficult to find in more saturated markets.
In many cases, the key differentiator may not be market selection alone but rather the specific execution frameworks that can help transform theoretical opportunity into tangible results.
Many investors typically evaluate emerging markets through traditional risk-reward metrics derived from commercial real estate or private equity models. This approach may not fully account for the unique characteristics of digital infrastructure in high-growth economies.
The investors who might achieve stronger returns often aren't necessarily those with the highest risk tolerance, but rather those who recognize that emerging markets may require significantly adapted operational frameworks rather than simply adjusted financial models.
These distinctions can be critical when navigating the complexities of these developing digital ecosystems.
Limitations of Conventional Approaches
The conventional approach to emerging market data center investment—applying developed market models with higher return thresholds to account for perceived risk—may often fall short of delivering expected results.
This approach might not fully address both the nature of the opportunity and the specific competitive dynamics at play in these diverse markets.
Investors who attempt to transplant Western operational models to emerging economies without significant adaptation may encounter unexpected challenges that could potentially impact projects, regardless of financial backing.
The standard playbook that proves effective in highly competitive established markets often requires substantial recalibration rather than minor adjustments when applied to regions with fundamentally different competitive landscapes.
Meanwhile, as substantial institutional capital continues to focus on established markets where competitive pressures may be intensifying returns, some forward-thinking investors appear to be developing specialized frameworks for emerging market entry.
These approaches might become more widely adopted within the industry over time, as they recognize that success factors in markets like Jakarta, Nairobi, or Santiago can differ significantly from those in Northern Virginia or Frankfurt.
These emerging frameworks often acknowledge the complexity and variability inherent in developing markets, where competitive conditions can vary dramatically from those in established regions and may evolve rapidly, requiring flexible, adaptable strategies.
The Emerging Market Opportunity Landscape
The emerging market opportunity often extends beyond the traditional investment focus on prime markets and secondary cities in developed regions. These markets frequently exhibit several distinguishing characteristics that may benefit from nuanced understanding:
Digital adoption in many regions appears to be accelerating from a lower base, potentially creating substantial growth in data processing requirements. Mobile-first digital economies may leapfrog traditional technology adoption patterns, sometimes creating demand profiles that differ from those in Western markets.
For example, in markets like Nigeria, Indonesia, and Mexico, smartphone penetration sometimes reaches 70% or higher while fixed broadband might remain below 30%, potentially creating distinct workload patterns and infrastructure needs that face different competitive pressures than in established markets.
Infrastructure development in these regions often progresses alongside demand rather than ahead of it, which may create competitive dynamics that differ substantially from established markets where multiple providers typically compete for existing demand.
Many of these markets present competitive landscapes where early entrants may have opportunities to establish market positions before the intense competition seen in developed markets emerges. The ability to effectively navigate these evolving competitive environments could potentially become a strategic advantage rather than simply addressing a development hurdle.
Regulatory frameworks in emerging markets are frequently evolving, with digital infrastructure policies sometimes being developed in response to market activity rather than proactively.
This environment may create both challenges and opportunities for investors who can effectively navigate and potentially contribute to regulatory development.
Some successful operators appear to go beyond mere compliance with regulations and may actively participate in helping shape appropriate frameworks, potentially gaining competitive advantages through regulatory engagement that might be more difficult to achieve in established markets with well-defined regulatory environments.
Strategic Entry Models for Emerging Markets
In contrast to conventional investment sequencing that typically prioritizes stable markets with established competitive dynamics, some successful global data center portfolios might include emerging market positioning at relatively early stages.
This approach may help establish market presence before competitive intensity reaches the levels seen in mature markets.
Local Partnership Frameworks
Joint ventures with established local entities may provide the most effective entry strategy in many regions.
These partnerships can offer critical advantages in navigating regulatory environments, securing land rights, and understanding local market dynamics—potentially creating competitive differentiators that may be difficult for later entrants to replicate.
The structure of these partnerships requires careful consideration of control rights, operational responsibilities, and exit mechanisms.
In markets like India, Indonesia, and Nigeria, local partners with existing relationships with government agencies and utility providers can potentially create meaningful competitive advantages through reduced development timelines and preferred access to resources compared to foreign entrants operating independently.
However, partnership selection requires thorough due diligence focused on operational capability, financial stability, and alignment of long-term objectives.
Different partnership structures may be appropriate for different competitive environments.
Early-stage markets may benefit from partnerships with telecommunications providers who can provide both connectivity and customer relationships, while more developed markets may favor real estate developers with land banks in strategic locations that offer competitive positioning.
Regulatory Navigation Strategies
Regulatory environments in emerging markets tend to be more fluid and relationship-dependent than in developed markets. Successful development often requires:
Proactive engagement with regulatory bodies to help shape policy development rather than simply responding to existing frameworks. This may include participation in industry working groups, providing educational resources to regulators, and developing model policies based on international best practices.
Understanding regional regulatory variations is essential, as policies can differ significantly even within countries. In India, for example, state-level policies for land acquisition, power procurement, and environmental clearances create vastly different development timelines across regions despite a common national framework.
Data sovereignty considerations have heightened importance in many emerging markets, with countries increasingly implementing requirements for local data storage and processing. These requirements may create both market opportunities and operational constraints that must be factored into investment strategies.
Financial Structuring for Market Risks
Emerging market investments require specialized financial approaches to address unique risk profiles:
Currency risk management strategies become critical in markets with volatile local currencies. Options include structuring customer contracts in hard currencies, implementing hedging programs, or developing natural hedges through local debt financing. The effectiveness of these approaches varies significantly by market and requires ongoing management.
Capital structure should typically be more conservative than in developed markets, with higher equity components and phased deployment strategies. This approach provides flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions and manage potential delays in development timelines.
Partnerships with development finance institutions (DFIs) and multilateral organizations may provide valuable financing options with longer tenors and risk-sharing mechanisms specifically designed for emerging markets.
Exit strategy planning should begin at market entry, with clear milestones for reassessing investment horizons. Potential exit paths may include sales to global operators seeking expansion, local strategic buyers, or infrastructure funds with specific emerging market mandates.
Regional Analysis: Evolving Development Approaches
Some of the next generation of digital infrastructure leaders may emerge not only from optimizing operations in established markets but potentially from creating adaptable models for emerging market deployment that might be replicated across different regions.
These approaches could represent an important evolution in how global data center portfolios respond to varying competitive conditions across markets at different stages of development.
Africa's Emerging Digital Corridors
Beyond the established South African market, meaningful opportunities are developing across the continent that challenge traditional infrastructure development models:
East Africa's digital corridor, anchored by Nairobi but extending to secondary cities like Mombasa, benefits from improved submarine cable connectivity and a relatively stable regulatory environment. Kenya's technology adoption leadership creates natural demand growth, while its position as a regional financial center drives data localization requirements.
Key early-stage tactics include securing locations with reliable primary power access, implementing modular deployment approaches to match capacity with demand growth, and establishing connectivity to regional submarine cable landing stations. Development timelines typically run 24-36 months from site identification to commissioning.
West Africa presents a longer-term opportunity centered on Nigeria's massive population base and growing digital economy. Lagos faces significant infrastructure challenges but represents a potential first-mover advantage for investors willing to address power reliability through comprehensive on-site generation solutions.
The investment thesis requires a 7-10 year horizon with careful phasing of capital deployment. Initial facilities typically require 2-3x the backup power capacity of comparable developed market facilities, significantly impacting capital efficiency metrics. Successful projects generally start with smaller initial footprints (1-2MW) with expansion capability rather than large speculative developments.
Specialized Southeast Asian Strategies
Southeast Asian markets beyond Singapore require tailored approaches that address their unique characteristics:
Indonesia's archipelago geography creates distinct challenges and opportunities. Jakarta represents the primary connectivity hub, but secondary cities like Surabaya and Bandung may offer specific advantages for domestic workloads. The recently liberalized foreign investment framework for data centers creates a time-sensitive opportunity for international investors.
Success factors include securing reliable land rights (often complex given Indonesia's land title system), implementing comprehensive power solutions that factor in grid reliability challenges, and navigating cabotage rules that impact connectivity options. Development timelines average 30-36 months but can be expedited through strategic partnerships with established local entities.
Vietnam combines strong economic growth with increasing digital adoption, creating robust demand fundamentals. However, regulatory complexity and opaque approval processes create barriers that favor investors with specialized local knowledge or strong government relationships.
The investment approach typically requires partnerships with state-affiliated entities to navigate approval processes effectively. Power procurement represents a key challenge, with significant advantages for projects that can secure reliable allocations from the state utility. Development timelines often face uncertainty due to multiple approval layers.
Latin America Beyond Brazil
While Brazil dominates Latin American digital infrastructure, other markets offer compelling opportunities with different risk-return profiles:
Chile combines political stability with robust connectivity infrastructure and renewable energy resources. Santiago serves as the primary hub, but secondary locations near hydroelectric resources in the south offer potential competitive advantages for certain workloads.
Key success factors include securing renewable energy contracts to address the national focus on sustainability, establishing connectivity to regional submarine cable systems, and positioning facilities to serve the country's mining and financial services sectors. Development timelines average 18-24 months with relatively predictable approval processes.
Mexico offers potential as both a domestic market and a secondary location for US workloads. Mexico City dominates as the primary market while Querataro faces infrastructure challenges but represents a future hyperscale hub for investors and operators willing to address power issues.
The approach requires careful attention to power procurement in a recently reformed energy market, with significant advantages for projects that secure contracts ahead of expected price increases. Security considerations impact both site selection and design requirements, with implications for capital and operating costs.
Emerging Market Implementation Framework
The emerging market opportunity requires a fundamentally different approach to infrastructure development, operations, and risk management than established markets. This represents a pattern interrupt from traditional data center investment models.
Infrastructure Strategy Adaptations
Infrastructure design for emerging markets typically requires significant adaptations from developed market standards:
Power infrastructure requires more comprehensive redundancy and often includes on-site generation as primary rather than backup capacity. The efficiency metrics must account for these redundancy requirements, which may impact design PUEs and overall economics. Generator capacity often reaches 100% of IT load versus 60-70% in developed markets.
Connectivity solutions frequently require investment in off-site infrastructure to create adequate diversity and reliability. This may include participation in submarine cable systems, metropolitan fiber rings, or regional backhaul networks. These investments should be evaluated as part of the overall project economics rather than as standalone business cases.
Security systems typically require enhancements beyond developed market standards, with more comprehensive perimeter protection, access control systems, and in some cases, security personnel. These requirements impact both capital costs and ongoing operational expenses.
Operational Excellence in Challenging Environments
Operational strategies require adaptation to local conditions while maintaining global standards:
Talent development becomes a critical strategic priority rather than simply a hiring function. Successful operators invest in comprehensive training programs, international rotation assignments, and technical certification pathways. These investments may represent 2-3x the training budgets typical in developed markets but yield significant advantages in workforce stability and capability.
Supply chain management requires more robust contingency planning and often local warehousing of critical spares. The transportation infrastructure in many emerging markets creates unique challenges for just-in-time delivery models common in developed markets. Comprehensive spares inventories may represent 3-5% of initial capital costs versus 1-2% in developed markets.
Energy management takes on heightened importance given the reliability and cost challenges in many markets. This may include complex optimization across grid power, on-site generation, and in some cases, renewable sources. The staffing and systems required to manage these systems effectively represent a meaningful operational consideration.
Risk Mitigation Frameworks
Comprehensive risk management becomes essential for emerging market success:
Political risk insurance and specialized contract structures can address concerns about regulatory stability and contract enforcement, with multilateral institutions often providing guarantees against expropriation, currency transfer restrictions, and political violence.
Physical risk factors require more extensive mitigation strategies, particularly for natural disasters, civil unrest, or infrastructure failures. These considerations impact both site selection and facility design, with implications for development costs and operational protocols.
Market timing risks can be managed through phased development approaches that allow adaptation to evolving demand patterns. Initial deployments typically represent 25-40% of ultimate site capacity, with expansion triggered by specific pre-leasing or utilization thresholds.
Decision Frameworks for Market Prioritization
Selecting and sequencing emerging market entry requires a structured approach that balances opportunity with risk:
Market assessment should evaluate fundamental factors beyond simple GDP metrics, including digital adoption rates, regulatory clarity, infrastructure readiness, and competitive landscape. These factors can be weighted according to investor risk tolerance and strategic priorities.
Entry sequencing should consider both market attractiveness and execution complexity, with initial markets selected to build organizational capability in emerging market operations. Success in initial markets creates templates that can be adapted for subsequent expansion.
Portfolio construction across emerging markets should balance higher-risk/higher-return opportunities with more stable markets at different development stages. This approach provides exposure to growth potential while managing overall portfolio volatility.
Contributing to the Next Phase of Digital Infrastructure
Investors who develop effective emerging market frameworks may position themselves to potentially achieve both financial returns and influence digital infrastructure development in economies representing significant future growth.
This approach complements the secondary market strategies outlined in our previous analysis, creating a more comprehensive global investment perspective.
While secondary cities in developed markets can offer balance between competitive intensity and growth opportunity, emerging markets might provide pathways to establish positions where competitive dynamics are still forming.
The relationship between market categories is evolving beyond simple risk-return profiles toward operational approaches that recognize varying competitive landscapes across regions.
Forward-thinking investors may recognize that success requires distinct but complementary capabilities tailored to each region's specific competitive environment.
This more balanced approach to global digital infrastructure investment might influence industry practices in the years ahead, though outcomes will naturally vary based on execution, timing, and regional market dynamics.
IF YOU ENJOYED THIS ARTICLE AND WANT MORE CONTENT LIKE THIS:
Subscribe to this newsletter to get notified when a new issue comes out (bi-weekly).
You can also connect with Obinna Isiadinso on Linkedin, Twitter, and YouTube.